3.8 : Hospitals and Medical Facilities
| 3.8.6 |
Energy
Benchmarks for Newly Constructed Outpatient Buildings, by Selected City and
End-Use |
|
|
|
(thousand Btu per square foot) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IECC Climate Zone |
|
Heating |
|
Cooling |
|
Water Heating |
|
Ventilation |
|
| Miami |
|
|
1A |
|
|
49.4 |
|
49.3 |
|
0.7 |
|
19.5 |
|
| Houston |
|
|
2A |
|
|
58.9 |
|
41.4 |
|
0.8 |
|
19.4 |
|
| Phoenix |
|
|
2B |
|
|
60.3 |
|
40.6 |
|
0.7 |
|
19.9 |
|
| Atlanta |
|
|
3A |
|
|
66.0 |
|
31.9 |
|
0.9 |
|
19.3 |
|
| Los Angeles |
|
3B |
|
|
63.8 |
|
26.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
18.3 |
|
| Las Vegas |
|
3B |
|
|
57.7 |
|
32.1 |
|
0.8 |
|
19.6 |
|
| San Francisco |
|
3C |
|
|
72.1 |
|
19.8 |
|
1.0 |
|
18.5 |
|
| Baltimore |
|
4A |
|
|
72.1 |
|
27.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
19.0 |
|
| Albuquerque |
|
4B |
|
|
63.5 |
|
23.7 |
|
1.0 |
|
21.7 |
|
| Seattle |
|
|
4C |
|
|
74.7 |
|
17.7 |
|
1.0 |
|
18.5 |
|
| Chicago |
|
|
5A |
|
|
75.3 |
|
21.3 |
|
1.1 |
|
18.8 |
|
| Boulder |
|
|
5B |
|
|
65.9 |
|
19.3 |
|
1.1 |
|
21.0 |
|
| Minneapolis |
|
6A |
|
|
81.3 |
|
19.0 |
|
1.1 |
|
18.9 |
|
| Helena |
|
|
6B |
|
|
74.3 |
|
15.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
20.0 |
|
| Duluth |
|
|
7 |
|
|
84.2 |
|
13.2 |
|
1.3 |
|
18.7 |
|
| Fairbanks |
|
8 |
|
|
99.7 |
|
8.8 |
|
1.4 |
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Note(s): |
Commercial
building energy benchmarks are based off of the current stock of commercial
buildings and are designed to provide a consistent baseline to compare
building performance in energy-use simulations. The benchmark building had
40,932 square feet and 3 floors. Benchmark interior lighting energy = 13.02
thousand Btu/SF. Interior equipment energy consumption = 46.01 thousand
Btu/SF. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOWNLOAD TABLE AS PDF XLS
Related Tables:
Sources:
|