3.10 : Hotels/Motels
| 3.10.6 |
Energy
Benchmarks for Newly Constructed Small Hotels, by Selected City and End-Use |
|
|
|
|
(thousand Btu per square foot) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IECC Climate Zone |
|
Heating |
|
Cooling |
|
Water Heating |
|
Ventilation |
|
| Miami |
|
|
1A |
|
|
0.2 |
|
17.9 |
|
5.4 |
|
5.3 |
|
| Houston |
|
|
2A |
|
|
2.5 |
|
13.6 |
|
6.5 |
|
5.0 |
|
| Phoenix |
|
|
2B |
|
|
1.8 |
|
14.1 |
|
5.9 |
|
5.3 |
|
| Atlanta |
|
|
3A |
|
|
4.5 |
|
9.7 |
|
7.6 |
|
4.8 |
|
| Los Angeles |
|
3B |
|
|
1.6 |
|
7.5 |
|
7.4 |
|
4.5 |
|
| Las Vegas |
|
3B |
|
|
3.0 |
|
10.5 |
|
6.6 |
|
4.9 |
|
| San Francisco |
|
3C |
|
|
4.2 |
|
5.2 |
|
8.3 |
|
4.3 |
|
| Baltimore |
|
4A |
|
|
8.0 |
|
7.8 |
|
8.4 |
|
4.5 |
|
| Albuquerque |
|
4B |
|
|
5.1 |
|
7.1 |
|
8.2 |
|
5.0 |
|
| Seattle |
|
|
4C |
|
|
6.9 |
|
4.1 |
|
8.8 |
|
4.1 |
|
| Chicago |
|
|
5A |
|
|
11.6 |
|
6.3 |
|
9.1 |
|
4.4 |
|
| Boulder |
|
|
5B |
|
|
8.2 |
|
5.4 |
|
9.1 |
|
4.8 |
|
| Minneapolis |
|
6A |
|
|
16.3 |
|
5.8 |
|
9.7 |
|
4.4 |
|
| Helena |
|
|
6B |
|
|
12.8 |
|
4.0 |
|
9.9 |
|
4.5 |
|
| Duluth |
|
|
7 |
|
|
20.7 |
|
3.9 |
|
10.8 |
|
4.3 |
|
| Fairbanks |
|
8 |
|
|
36.6 |
|
2.7 |
|
12.0 |
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Note(s): |
Commercial
building energy benchmarks are based off of the current stock of commercial
buildings and reflect 2004 ASHRAE 90.1 Climate Zones. They are designed to
provide a consistent baseline to compare building performance in energy-use
simulations.The benchmark building had 43,186 square feet and 4 floors.
Benchmark interior lighting energy = 13.79 thousand Btu/SF. Interior
equipment energy consumption = 21.98 thousand Btu/SF. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOWNLOAD TABLE AS PDF XLS
Related Tables:
Sources:
|